Australian Natural Resources Atlas

Natural Resource Topics

Water resources - Management and Development - Tasmania

Location map of SWMA Pieman River

Basin & Surface Water Management Area: Pieman River

Introduction

Copyright

As resource demands and pressure increases so to do the requirements of both management and information needs. Outlined below are the key issues facing the region as determined by the State / Territory water management agency.

What is the estimated demand for surface water in Pieman River?

Use and Sustainable Yield

Comment about sustainable yield figure:

Not provided for this SWMA as a satisfactory environmental flow estimate could not be agreed on in time for the Audit.

This SWMA is occupied by a Hydro Electric Corporation Water District. The current general position of the HEC in relation to environmental flows is that it must be based on the best scientific information available ie be scientifically defensible. The time in arriving at an amount for environmental flow is outside the timeframe for Audit completion.

Sustainable yield (ML/yr):

no data

Threshold year for sustainable year:

no data

Diversion Volume 1996 (ML):

8,190

Current resource development categorisation:

HIGH DEVELOPMENT

Estimated in 2020

Estimated use in 2020(ML):

8,190

% change from 1996:

0

Resource development categorisation:

HIGH DEVELOPMENT

Estimated in 2050

Estimated use in 2050(ML):

8,190

% change from 1996:

0

Resource development categorisation:

HIGH DEVELOPMENT

How was this assessment undertaken in the Pieman River Surface Water Management Area?

Development Potential:

This SWMA has reached its forseeable full development potential.

Management goals and objectives:

1 Essential needs of town water supplies and stock and domestic needs, 2 Ecosystem needs.

3. Water for Hydro Electric Corporatin, 4 Supply of water for irrigation and non essential town supply purposes eg parks and gardens,

See TAS Water Resources Assessment 2000 Report and Water Resources Assessment 2000 Technical Report for comment on methods and assumptions.

Current 2000Desired 2000Desired 2020Desired 2050

Management information

Scale of allocation planning

STATE/TERITORY

STATE/TERITORY

Inputs to allocation

BROAD RESOURCE INVESTIGATION

BROAD RESOURCE INVESTIGATION

Type of monitoring - quantity

BROAD-SCALE

BROAD-SCALE

Type of monitoring - quality

COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING

COMPREHENSIVE MONITORING

Distribution efficiency (H,M,L)

HIGH

HIGH

Use efficiency (H,M,L)

HIGH

HIGH

Resource management efficiency (H,M,L)

HIGH

HIGH

Degree of licensing

ALL MAJOR USES

ALL USES

Water trading (None, Limited, Significant)

NONE

NONE

Mechanism of trading

Volume traded (ML/yr)

no data

no data

no data

Number of transactions

Inter-basin transfers

NONE

NONE

Volume transferred (ML/yr)

no data

no data

no data

Environmental allocation category:

  • None
  • <33% of waterways with formal allocations
  • between 33% and 66% of waterways with formal allocations
  • >66 % of waterways with formal allocations

no data

Comments on Management Responses in the Pieman River Surface Water Management Area

Current Management Response:

Desired (Current) Management Response:

2020 Management Response:

Not applicable

2050 Management Response:

Not applicable

See TAS Water Resources Assessment 2000 Report for comment on management responses.

Assessment of Monitoring

Efficacy of the network:

Not applicable

Data management requirements:

Not applicable

Protective management:

Current methods used in relation to these catchments should be satisfactory. Methods allow for assessment of current arrangements and for these to be modified as required

Options for monitoring:

Not applicable

See TAS Water Resources Assessment 2000 Technical Report for an assessment of monitoring

Data Availability, Gaps and Recommendations

Data Availability:

There are a number of stream gauging sites in the Pieman SWMA.

Current Gaps and Recommendations:

Data Gaps: The following have been identified as gaps in data:

1. Assumptions used in Review 85 for determining divertible yield;

2. No yield for HEC system available

3. Information on sustainable yield not available;

4. Salinity data

5. No natural mean annual flow available.

Recommendations:

1. Re estimate divertible and developed yield for the SWMA.

2. Estimate sustainable yield for SWMA.

3. Review and where appropriate ugrade water quality monitoring stations.

Future Gaps:

Not applicable

See TAS Water Resources Assessment 2000 Technical Report for a review of data availability,gaps and recommendations.

Further information

Key

   Links to an another web site
   Opens a pop-up window