Australian Natural Resources Atlas

Publications

Australian Natural Resources Information 2002

National Land and Water Resources Audit, 2002
ISBN: 0 642 37131 8

Managing Our Investment

Australia invests hundreds of millions of dollars each year in data collection and monitoring to inform decision making. Investment is made through Commonwealth, State, Territory and industry activities. For water alone, the Audit has identified monitoring and data collection programs with a total cost more than $185 million each year (Atech 2000).

A more efficient use of this investment in data is essential if we are to better inform and prioritise natural resource decisions.

However, data issues still arise:

Long-term systematic management of our investment in natural resources data minimises the costs of finding, remediating or re-collecting data, and maximises the opportunities to apply the data to decision making and natural resource management. Resources freed by good data management may then be used to fill critical gaps in our knowledge of our natural resources.

Monitoring our natural resources requires effective coordination and partnerships
Monitoring our natural resources requires effective coordination and partnerships

This chapter identifies those actions required to manage the investment in natural resources data and information services developed by the Audit and its partners. Issues discussed and the recommendations identified are designed to complement those in the recently launched Spatial Information Industry Action Agenda (Commonwealth of Australia 2001b), and the Commonwealth Policy on Spatial Data Access and Pricing (Commonwealth of Australia 2001a).

In particular, the Spatial Information Industry Action Agenda addresses private sector involvement in the development of the data infrastructure, and issues of education and training required to improve the capacity to use spatial information systems. The Commonwealth Policy on Spatial Data Access and Pricing outlines actions required to build on the success achieved by the Audit to negotiate a single, generic, multilateral agreement with States and Territories through ANZLIC - the Spatial Information Council to enhance access to spatial data.

Building the natural resource spatial data infrastructure

The Audit and its partners have shown that there are substantial benefits in a coordinated approach to providing and managing information across Australia. Yet, lessons from the past suggest that there needs to be a strong and explicit commitment to maintain the systems, data and partnerships that have been developed over the past four years.

Through ANZLIC - the Spatial Information Council, all jurisdictions have agreed on a set of national principles to improve coordination and develop a national spatial data infrastructure (ANZLIC 1999). It is essential that these principles be implemented.

National principles for spatial data management

Coordinating the development of Australia-wide data to support natural resource decision making

While the principles for developing an Australia-wide spatial data infrastructure have been agreed by all jurisdictions and may appear simple, they are not always being implemented.

The Spatial Information Industry Action Agenda (Commonwealth of Australia 2001b) notes that poor coordination of public data collection between public sector agencies has led to:

The Commonwealth has spent over $20 million for mapping vegetation in past seven years through Commonwealth - State partnership programs including the Regional Forest Agreements, Bushcare, the National Forest Inventory, Save the Bush and the Cape York Peninsula Land Use Study. Despite this significant investment, the Audit assessment of native vegetation (NLWRA 2001e) found that it was difficult to find, standardise and integrate the data to support a national assessment of native vegetation resources. Most of these data are not documented in the Australian Spatial Data Directory, and programs often used different methods to collect the data, define attributes and generate maps.

National coordination

There are many agencies at all levels of government that can supply local, regional or Australia-wide data to help build a national picture.

When undertaking the Audit assessments, the best quality and most accessible Australia-wide data included climate, geology, agricultural statistics, and topography (roads, rivers and elevation) data. These sets of data had been developed through long-term Commonwealth and State/Territory programs, applying agreed standards to develop products that were consistent across Australia.

To date, most Commonwealth funding for data about vegetation, soil, water and land resources has been through short-term projects. The data generated by short-term and regional programs is potentially useful in the construction of Australia-wide data to support natural resource management activities. However with many custodians involved, it is essential to enhance coordination and funding arrangements so that the components of the national picture are compatible.

Mor effective national coordination is needed to establish strategic data collection priorities, avoid duplication and provide long-term certainty for data collection and management. Strong coordination arrangements are required with leadership and incentives to ensure that efficiencies are achieved.

Consultative and coordinated approaches to data acquisition and determination of priorities will ensure that data enjoy the widest use.

Australia is wasting valuable intellectual and capital resources because of the multitude of uncoordinated data collection and management programs. This situation is not sustainable either from a public policy or investment perspective.

To efficiently build Australia-wide data, national coordination arrangements are needed that:

Government funding of data at all levels of government must encourage consistency, integration and ongoing development of Australia's data infrastructure. Data collections and ongoing monitoring projects, whether large or small, and irrespective of scale, should be managed in accordance with the national data management framework. The Commonwealth can show leadership through better coordinating its own natural resource data collections.

Recommendations

Maximum value for money

To maximise investment in data collection and the provision of information at a range of scales, it is recommended that the Natural Heritage Ministerial Board, through the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, ensure that Commonwealth, State and Territory agencies use standard conditions in contracts and agreements when collecting natural resource data. Conditions should seek to improve the availability of consistent natural resource data to government, industry and the community. The conditions should ensure that:

Commonwealth, State and Territory agencies should be encouraged to adopt these conditions for all spatial data.

Progress reports

It is recommended that the Natural Heritage Ministerial Board, through the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council, requests that ANZLIC - the Spatial Information Council provide yearly reports on the status of the natural resource spatial data infrastructure to the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council detailing progress on key activities to:

ensure that users can find out whether suitable natural resources data exist by:

ensure that government, industry and the community can easily obtain natural resources data by:

ensure that natural resource data are comparable and consistent, where required by:

reduce duplication by: